In the following Catholic Chronicle we will look intently at the next direct result of transubstantiation in official Catholic systematic theology: “The Sacrifice of the Mass.”
CHRONICLE II: THE SACRIFICE OF THE MASS–JESUS DIES AGAIN
In Chronicle I, we thoroughly examined the doctrine of transubstantiation its history, practice, and real meaning. But we have waited for this second article to answer the question: Why? Why must there be present in the Mass the literal body and blood of Jesus? What purpose does it serve? The answer is found in these startling words: “The sacrifice of the Mass is the same sacrifice of the cross, for there is the same priest, the same victim, and the same offering.” (“The Roman Catholic Sacrifice of the Mass” by Bartholomew F. Brewer, Ph.D.)
And in the words of Pope Pius IV…
“I profess likewise that in the mass there is offered to God a true, proper, and propitiatory (conciliatory, to soothe the anger of, to win or regain the goodwill of, to appease, placate or make friendly, to reconcile – Webster’s New World Dictionary and Harper’s Bible Dictionary.) sacrifice for the living and the dead.” (From the fifth article of the creed of Pope Pius IV.)
That is the incredible truth! The Roman Catholic Church believes and teaches that in every Mass, in every church, throughout the world (estimated at up to 200,000 Masses a day) that Jesus Christ is being offered up again, physically, as a sacrifice for sin (benefitting not only those alive, but the dead as well!) (“It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment” Heb. 9:27.) Every Roman Mass is a re-creation of Jesus’ death for the sins of the world. Not a symbolic re-creation! But a literal, actual offering of the flesh and blood of the Lord to make daily atonement for all the sins that have been daily committed since Jesus was crucified almost 2,000 years ago (“The Catholic Home Instruction Book” #3, P. 90.).
That’s why the elements must become physically Jesus’ body and blood, so that they can be once again offered for sin:
“The Holy Eucharist is the perpetual continuation of this act of sacrifice and surrender of our Lord. When the Lord’s Supper is celebrated, Christ again presents Himself in His act of total surrender to the Father in death.” (“The Spirit of Jesus” pp.89-90, Imprimatur: John Joseph Cardinal Carberry, Archbishop of St. Louis.)
“He offers Himself continually to the Father, in the same eternal act of offering that began on the cross and will never cease.” (“Sons of God in Christ” Book 4, P. 117.)
“The Mass is identical to Calvary it is a sacrifice for sin it must be perpetuated to take away sin.” (For Them Also, pp.289-299.)
The catechism of the Council of Trent required all pastors to explain that not only did the elements of the Mass contain flesh, bones and nerves as a part of Christ, “But also a WHOLE CHRIST.” (Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol. 2, p.77.) Thus it is referred to as “the sacrifice of the Mass” and as “a renewal of the sacrifice of the cross”!
(“A Catholic Word List” p. 45.)
THE COUNCIL OF TRENT ON “THE SACRIFICE OF THE MASS”
As we shared in Chronicle I, the Council of Trent was called to clarify and standardize Catholic doctrine in response to the challenges of the Reformation. The canons on this subject (passed in Session XXII. Cap II.) are as follows:
“1. If any one shall say, that in the Mass there is not offered to God a true and proper sacrifice, or that what is offered is nothing else than Christ given to be eaten, let him be anathema. [Anathema – The strongest denunciation of a person that can be made in the ancient Greek (the original language of the New Testament). Literal meaning: “devoted to death.” “A thing or person accursed or damned” – Webster’s New World Dictionary and Harper’s Bible Dictionary.]
“2. If any one shall say that in these words, ‘This do in remembrance of Me,’ Christ did not make the apostles priests, or did not ordain that they themselves and other priests should offer His body and blood, let him be anathema.
“3. If any one shall say that the sacrifice of the Mass is only of praise and thanksgiving, or a bare commemoration of the sacrifice performed on the cross, but not propitiatory; or that it is of benefit only to the person who takes it, and ought not to be offered for the living and the dead for sins, punishments, satisfactions, and other necessities, let him be accursed.
“4. If any one shall say that a blasphemy is ascribed to the most holy sacrifice of Christ performed on the cross by the sacrifice of the Mass let him be accursed.”
BUT IS THIS THE BELIEF OF ROME TODAY?
If any be in doubt as to the modern Roman position, we shall quote the recent (1963-65) Second Vatican Council:
“At the Last Supper… our Saviour instituted the Eucharistic sacrifice of His body and blood. He did this in order to perpetuate the sacrifice of the cross…” p. 154, The Documents of Vatican II, Walter M. Abbott, S.J.
The catechism books teach that the reason the Mass is the same sacrifice as that of Calvary is because the victim in each case was Jesus Christ. (“The New Baltimore Catechism” #3, Question 931.) In fact, they refer to the bread of the Eucharist as the “host” which is the Latin word hostia which literally means “victim” (Webster’s New World Dictionary.)
BUT WHY “THE SACRIFICE” OF THE MASS?
We will now quote the Church’s own contemporary literature to fully answer this question (taken from the book, This Is The Catholic Church, published by the Catholic Information Service, Knights of Columbus, Imprimatur: (sanction or approval. Specifically, permission to print or publish a book or article containing nothing contrary to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church – Webster’s New World Dictionary.) Most Reverend John F. Whealon, Archbishop of Hartford:
“Sacrifice is the very essence of religion. And it is only through sacrifice that union with the Creator can be perfectly acquired. It was through sacrifice that Christ Himself was able to achieve this for man. It is only through the perpetuation of that sacrifice that this union may be maintained. “What makes the Mass the most exalted of all sacrifices is the nature of the victim, Christ Himself. For the Mass is the continuation of Christ’s sacrifice which He offered through His life and death. Jesus then, is the priest, the offerer of the sacrifice. But Christ was not only the priest of this sacrifice (of the cross), He was also the victim, the very object itself of this sacrifice. “The Mass is thus the same as the sacrifice of the cross. No matter how many times it is offered, nor in how many places at one time, it is the same sacrifice of Christ. Christ is forever offering Himself in the Mass.” (pp. 20-24.)
BUT JESUS SAID “IT IS FINISHED!”
Every true believer loves the sound of these words: “It is finished!” (John 19:30). For it is the wonderful Jesus Christ, and that they are called “other Christs” (alter Christus, in Latin.)
This explains the great adulation and honor heaped upon the Roman priest. The French Catholic Saint J.B.M. Vianney said that, “Where there is no priest there is no sacrifice, and where there is no sacrifice there is no religion… without the priest the death and passion of our Lord would be of no avail to us… see the power of the priest! By one word from his lips, he changes a piece of bread into a God! A greater feat than the creation of a world.” He also said, “If I were to meet a priest and an angel, I would salute the priest before saluting the angel. The angel is a friend of God, but the priest holds the place of God… next to God Himself, the priest is everything!” What humiliation for Jesus Christ, the One who has been given a name “above all other names!”
BUT ISN’T ROME CHANGING?
Today, many are expressing hope that Rome is turning toward scriptural christianity. They point to the many reforms of Vatican II (i.e., Such as Masses performed in the common language rather than exclusively in Latin, the relaxation of taboos such as eating meat on Friday, etc.) and also to the ever-widening charismatic renewal. True, these things appear to be a positive sign of change, and many are thrilled by them; but most fail to realize that these changes are only superficial. For Rome could never reject the sacrifice of the Mass just streamline it enough to keep the truth of its meaning hidden. Pope John XXIII made it clear that His Church is bound “to all the teachings of the Church in its entirety and preciseness, as it still shines forth in the act of the Council of Trent and First Vatican Council…” (The Documents of Vatican II, Abbott, S.J.)
It is clear that the whole of Roman teaching and belief is founded on this premise of the continual sacrifice of Christ for sin:
“It should be easy to see why the Mass holds such an important place in the Church’s life. The Mass is the very essence of the Church. Within it the Church’s life, and the Church’s very existence is centered. If there were no mass, there could be no Catholic Church. The Mass is our act of worship, an act which we know to be really worthy of God, because it is the sacrifice of God’s own Son.
“What the sacrifices of the old law were unable to accomplish what no other form of human worship can accomplish^the Mass performs: Perfect atonement is made for sin. “The souls of men yet unborn, together with those now living and those who have come into existence since Christ’s sacrifice, all have need of the salvation which Christ has won for us. It is through the Mass as well as through the other sacraments that the effects of Christ’s salvation are applied to the souls of men.” (‘This is the Catholic Church’, pp. 24-25.)
It is made thoroughly clear that Rome will forever put its faith in the Mass for the eternal forgiveness of sins. To remove this belief from her system of theology, would be like knocking out the pillars of a great edifice the whole building would come tumbling down!
PAUL’S EXTREME WARNING
As I sat stunned, reading all the “Let them be accursed”-threats of the Council of Trent, I could not help but think how their curses would only fall back on their own heads for the words of our brother Paul call out across the centuries:
“But even though we, or an angel from heaven, should preach to you a gospel contrary to that which we have preached to you, let him be accursed!” (Gal. 1:8).
Not only does Paul warn that an authentic angel from heaven should not be heeded while preaching a “different doctrine,” but he gives the ultimate warning: “… even though we”! Paul strictly warned the Galatians, not even to listen to him – the chief apostle and master of true doctrine – if he should reverse himself on any of the fundamental teachings of the gospel. How much more then, should we reject the appalling traditions and practices of a system that is not only unbiblical, but is actually steeped in mysticism, bordering dangerously on the occult!
CONCLUSION: THE DEFINITION OF A “CULT”
Now I am sure, many of you who have been reading this, might have been wondering if (and when) I would use this word. Today, the word “cult” is thrown around without much thought. People seem much too eager to use it to describe any individual or group that doesn’t exactly agree with them. And I do not, and will not use the word lightly. But as far as I can see from the Bible, a person is only in danger of being grouped with false brethren by tampering with three very basic issues of biblical truth. (These are greatly condensed for this example.)
1. Who Jesus is: Son of God, God the Son, Creator of the Universe.
2. What He came to do to: Die once for all, for the sins of mankind, then raise from the dead as the eternal high priest of all true believers.
3. How a person directly benefits from Christ’s death for sin: He is accounted as righteous through a total faith and rest in the finished work of Christ, and becomes the possessor of God’s free gift eternal life (salvation).
The Roman Catholic Church has been considered a true christian faith, mainly because it is generally known that their theology is quite orthodox on point #1. But as we have pointed out in these two chronicles, they are perilously shaky on the atonement Christ’s substitutionary death for sinners, #2. But if there is any doubt left at all, as to whether or not the Roman Church is authentically and biblically Christian, there will be a complete and thorough study of the Roman view on how one obtains salvation in our third installment of “The Catholic Chronicles.”
1]- The Roman Catholic Sacrifice of the Mass, by Bartholomew F. Brewer, Ph.D.
2]- Propitiatory – conciliatory, to soothe the anger of, to win or regain the goodwill of, to appease, placate or make
friendly, to reconcile – Webster’s New World Dictionary and Harper’s Bible Dictionary.
3]- “It is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment”(Heb.9:27).
4]- The Catholic Home Instruction Book #3, p.90.
5]- the Spirit of Jesus pp.89-90, Imprimatur: John Joseph CardinalCarberry, Archbishop of St.Louis.
6]- Sons of God in Christ Book 4, p.117.
7]- For Them Also, pp.289-299.
8]- Encyclopedia of Religions, Vol.2, p.77.
9]- “A Catholic Word List” p.45.
10]- Anathema – The strongest denunciaiton of a person that can be made in the ancient Greek (the original
language of the New Testament). Literal meaning: “devoted to death.” A thing or person accursed or damned –
Webster’s New World Dictionary and Harper’s Bible Dictionary.
11]- “The New Baltimore Catechism” #3, Question 931.
12]- Webster’s New World Dictionary.
13]- Imprimatur – Sanction or approval. Specifically, permission to print or publish a book or article containing
nothing contrary to the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church – Webster’s New World Dictionary.
15]- The Sacrifice of Christ by Richard W.Grace.
16] In Latin.
17]- i.e., Such as Masses performed in the common language rather than exclusively in Latin, the relaxation of
taboos such as eating meat on Friday, etc.
18]- The Documents of Vatican II, Abbot,S.J.
20]- This Is The Catholic Church pp.24-25.
21]- These are greatly condensed for this example.
by Keith Green